Publications

Dr Jarosław Grykiel

2003

1. Critical review: Supreme Court Resolution of 14 February 2002 (III CZP 81/01), published in Poznań College of Communications and Management Research Papers, No. 08/01/2003, pp. 123-130 [place of performance for pecuniary obligations].

2004

2. “A partnership limited by shares in organisation as a civil law entity”, an article published in “Law and the Challenges of Today” (ed.), Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Law and Administration Papers, Volume X, Poznań 2004, pp. 55-67.

2005

3. “Setting dividends in public limited companies”, an article published in „Law and the Challenges of Today. Volume II” (ed.), Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Law and Administration Papers, Volume XV, Poznań 2005, pp. 51-64.

4. “A commercial power of attorney: legal ramifications”, an article published in Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny quarterly, No. 2/2005, pp. 83-100.

5.  “Article 1093 Civil Code. A short commentary on interpretation”, an article published in Monitor Prawniczy bi-weekly, No. 23/2005.

6.  “The concepts of business and professional activity in light of Article 431 Civil Code”, an article published in Studia Prawnicze quarterly, No. 4/2005.

7. Critical review: Supreme Court Judgment of 9 July 2003 (IV CKN 305/01), published in Rejent monthly, 11/2005 [construction developer agreement]. 

8.  “Commercial power of attorney: a form of conferral”, an article published in Łazarski University Research Papers, Warsaw 2005.

2006

9. “Creditor protection instruments in companies”, an article published in conference proceedings (ed.) for 3rd Research Conference on Law and the Challenges of Today (2005), Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Law and Administration, Poznań 2006. 

10.  “A branch-limited commercial power of attorney under Article1095 Civil Code”, an article published in Przegląd Prawa Handlowego monthly, No. 10/2006.  

2007

11. “Grant of commercial power of attorney to a member of principal’s representation body”, an article published in Glosa quarterly, No. 5/2007.

12. article published in Studia Prawnicze quarterly, No. 4/2007.

13. Critical review: Supreme Administrative Court judgment of 22 December 2004 (FSK 787/04), published in Glosa quarterly 2/2007 [grant of substitute power of attorney by a commercial proxy]

2008

14.  “Creation of a commercial power of attorney”, a monograph, C. H. Beck publishing house, Warsaw 2008.  

15. “Acceptance of a commercial power of attorney as a condition for authorisation to become effective”, an article published in Państwo i Prawo monthly, No. 4/2008.  

16. “Civil Code regulations on a commercial power of attorney”, an article published in Edukacja Prawnicza monthly, No. 10/2008.  

17. “Legal transactions and their legal effects”, an article published in conference proceedings (ed.) for 5th Research Conference on Law and the Challenges of Today (2008), Adam Mickiewicz University, Faculty of Law and Administration, Poznań 2008.

18. Critical review: Supreme Court Judgment of 19 November 2003 (V CK 471/02), published in Rejent monthly, No. 3/2008 [right holder’s claims under a preliminary contract].

19. Critical review: Warsaw Appeals Court judgment of 6 April 2006 (I ACa 1116/05), published in Monitor Prawniczy bi-weekly, No. 1/2008 [effect of liquidation of a private limited company on its existing obligations].

20. Critical review: Supreme Court Judgment of 30 June 2004 (IV CK 521/03), published in Palestra monthly, No. 3-4/2008 [construction developer agreement].

21. Critical review: Poznań Appeals Court Judgment of 20 April 2006 (I ACa 1282/05), published in Monitor Prawniczy bi-monthly, No. 9/2008 [construction developer agreement].

22. Critical review: Supreme Court Judgment of 8 August 2007 (I CSK 177/07), published in Monitor Prawniczy bi-monthly, nr 19/2008 [construction developer agreement].

23. Critical review: Supreme Court Resolution (7) of 14 September 2007 (III CZP 31/07), published in Prawo Spółek monthly, No. 11/2008 [effects of defective representation in legal person’s governing body].

24. Critical review: Supreme Court Judgment of 29 November 2007 (III CSK 169/07), published in Prawo Spółek monthly, No. 4/2009 [multiple source of authorisation and validity of representation].

2009

25. “Transfer of a partnership member’s share of rights and obligations, Part I”, an article published in Prawo Spółek monthly, No. 9/2009.

26. “Transfer of a partnership member’s share of rights and obligations, Part II”, an article published in Prawo Spółek monthly, No. 10/2009.

27. Critical review: Supreme Court Resolution of 21 July 2006 (III CZP 45/06), published in Monitor Prawniczy bi-weekly, No. 10/2009 [declaration of bankruptcy and expiry of commercial power of attorney].

28. Critical review: Supreme Court Judgment of 13 December 2007 (I CSK 314/07), published in PUG monthly, No. 8/2009 [effect of bankruptcy declaration on current powers of attorney].

29. Critical review: Supreme Court Resolution of 5 December 2008 (III CZP 124/08), published in Państwo i Prawo monthly, No. 9/2009 [entry in National Court Register and protection of third parties].

30. Critical review: Supreme Court Resolution of 30 May 2008 (III CZP 43/08), published in Monitor Prawniczy monthly, No. 21/2009 [scope of parties’ freedom to set terms of company representation]

2010

31. “Right holder’s claims under a preliminary contract in case of a transfer of performance under a promised contract”, an article published in convention proceedings titled “Contracting and performing obligations” (ed.) for 3rd Polish Convention of Civil Law Specialists in Wrocław (2008), Warsaw 2010.

32. Commentary on Articles 56-81 Civil Code, C. H. Beck publishing house, Warsaw 2010 (co-author).

2011

33. „Mergers and acquisitions” a book for practitioners, Lexis Nexis publishing house, Warsaw 2011 (co-author).

34. Critical review: Supreme Court Resolution of 24 January 2007 (III CZP 143/06), published in Glosa quarterly, No. 2/2011 [legal status of property disclosed after company liquidation].

35. Critical review: Supreme Court Resolution of 19 November 2010 (III CZP 82/10), published in Rejent monthly, No. 12/2011 [scope of notary’s competence when authenticating a signature]